Solar Cycle 25: Changing of the Guard.
Outlook 2022/2023 – A New Cycle Begins
04-28-22 – It is often impossible to identify the start of something until after that something has begun to evolve… and that something has been definitively identified as a ‘something’.
The start of most wars is not identified until after the participants – or sometimes the historians – know that it actually was the start of a war. There are many conflicts, but only certain ones expand into a war.
Similarly, most bull markets – and bear markets – are not identified at their onset. It is only after a market has moved far enough away from an extreme to confirm it is in a bull or bear market.
One of the reasons I prefer to use other indicators in place of a technique like Elliott Wave principle is that it takes multiple waves – moving away from an extreme point – to finally confirm that a wave structure has turned and a new impulse wave (the direction of the primary trend) is underway.
Is a sell-off part of an ’a-b-c’ correction before a new rally? Or is that sell-off the wave ‘1’ of wave ‘1’ of wave ‘1’ of a new primary downtrend?
An Elliott Wave Tangent
That is not to criticize Elliott Wave. It still has several strengths and valid applications… as well as a special place in my trading journey since it was my first real exposure to any form of technical analysis. I was introduced to Elliott Wave in 1979/1980 and spent a few years studying and judiciously applying it in the markets… with mixed results.
I even spent a period of time in the early-1990’s devoting 20 – 30 minutes on each Friday morning calling A.J. (‘Jack’) Frost – the co-author of The Elliott Wave Principle – in British Columbia and talking with him (and often his wife Francis), about the markets and whatever else might come to mind.
To this day, I have a collection of handwritten letters (and many of the stamped envelopes) from Jack – as well as copies of the some of the letters I wrote him and notes from our phone conversations – as a memento. I have also had some very gracious interactions with Bob Prechter – as recently as 2016 and as long ago as the late-1980’s. I hold Elliott Wave in a special place in my heart.
I only mention this to place my sparse use of Elliott Wave in context… as well as my strict aversion to debating wave counts in various markets. That topic comes up a lot of times, so it is worth addressing. Like most technical indicators, it has a place and a time. It also has strengths and weaknesses.
One has to do with definitively identifying the start of a new trend… the main theme of this discussion.
Back to the Subject at Hand…
The use of cycles is one approach that helps identify the time to look for the start of ‘something’ (even before it has happened) – whether that be a new trend in the markets, the recurrence of Disease Cycles or War Cycles, a new geopolitical reality, or even the time for the start of a potentially disruptive sunspot cycle or Seismic Swarm Cycle.
Just as one conflict does not signal a war, one earthquake or volcano does not signal a swarm of seismic activity, and one outbreak does not signal the onset of a pandemic – one market sell-off does not signal a major bear market… at least not by itself.
And that is, yet again, where the principle of synergy comes into play. It is the coincidental occurrence of multiple corroborating factors that often takes those seemingly random events – like those just cited – and places them in a different context.
What’s the point?
A New Cycle?
I would never start a discussion like this without an ‘endgame’ in mind. However, since this is intended to be the start of a somewhat larger discussion, it is okay to lay a little groundwork first.
There are a myriad of factors & cycles – many discussed over the past ~decade and some not yet discussed – that argued for 2021/2022 to mark a major cyclic transition, a type of ‘changing of the guard’ or ‘handing the baton’ from one cycle to another.
I intend on reviewing, updating and elaborating on many of these in the coming months. One of those has not received much attention lately – even though it is exhibiting many signs of reaching fruition. That is the cycle of European Unification – discussed throughout the past decade – projected to reach a crescendo in 2018 – 2021 and yield a new reality in the years that follow (2022 – 2025 – ??).
There were many factors and points of evidence to watch for – described in those discussions – including the breakdown in the Euro. The following are just a few, bullet-pointed for current brevity:
- This cycle was expected to coincide with all the related cycles identifying 2016 – 2021 as the culmination of one major 40-Year Cycle and 2022 – 2025 as the initial years of a new 40-Year Cycle. (While the start of something might not have been immediately evident, the timing for it was.)
- The discussion centered around the principle that unity rarely occurs out of normal, run-of-the-mill circumstances and that it would take multiple threats of dis-unity to finally trigger a new unification. (Brexit was a perfect example.) Complacency does not lead to change… but conflict or challenges often do.
- Europe would have to further separate and approach the edge of an economic & diplomatic abyss before any real unity was likely to occur… it wouldn’t just emerge out of a vacuum.
- 2018 – 2021 was identified as the culmination of these European unification and disunification cycles and should usher in a new phase of European Unity in the years that followed.
- The early years of this new Cycle of European Unity would coincide with the emergence of War Cycles in late-2021 – late-2025.
The period of 2016 – 2021 saw three primary factors fulfilling this and setting the stage for a move back toward some new form of unification:
1 – Self-induced disunity (Brexit, multiple referendums, Catalonia/Spain, etc.
2 – Outward political attacks (mainly from the US during the last administration and even the one prior).
3 – Threat of military attack (beginning Nov ‘21).
The ‘2’ Year
One of the better known cycles is the Decennial Cycle (dating back to late-1930’s and the book ‘Tides and the Affairs of Men’ by Edgar L Smith. Simply put, the Decennial Cycle postulates that similar years of each decade experience similar market action (i.e. certain years are down years, others are up, etc.).
There is certainly some truth to that with one particular facet highlighted in the January ‘22 INSIIDE Track and its discussion of the stock market 40-Year Cycle and 20-Year Cycle – all tied to lows that occurred during the ‘2’ year of respective decades.
The 40-Year Cycle linked lows in 1862, 1902, 1942 and 1982 while the 20-Year Cycle linked lows in 1942, 1962, 1982 and 2002. In both cases, the resulting low-low-low-low Cycle Progression portends an inversion and likely high in 2022.
The discussion on that 40-Year Cycle traced economic events back to 1782 and 1822 – both of which followed multi-year tumultuous periods and ushered in new multi-year and multi-decade cycles. What about European Unification Cycles and the ‘2’ year?
1992 – Maastricht Treaty, leading to creation and introduction of Euro.
2002 – Introduction of Euro.
2012 – Height (or depth) of Euro Debt Crisis (following related crises in Greece, Iceland, etc.) – leading many to fear an imminent global depression.
2022 – Euro plunging as Europe uniting over threat of common enemy.
The ‘2’ years have timed the ‘start of something’ repeatedly… and it appears 2022 is no different.”
Solar Cycle 25 is coinciding with seismic shifts (literally and metaphorically) in 2021 – 2025 while fulfilling analysis for equity markets to peak in early-2022 and enter a 1 – 2 year decline and related analysis in interest rates & inflation (inflation forecast to surge from mid-2020 into 3Q ’22 while interest rates are forecast to rise from 3Q ’20 into 2Q ’23), in geopolitical turmoil (War Cycles projected for late-2021 – late-2025), and geophysical instability (earthquake cycles rising/coinciding with volcanic cycles colliding in 2022 – ’24).
This type of instability often coincides with major conflicts so it is no surprise that Middle East/Israel War Cycles collide in 2023 as well. Alpide Belt earthquakes could coincide, with particular focus on Turkey & Iran. Reinforcing that, Solar/Sunspot Cycles pinpoint 2023 as the most likely time for a major, disruptive solar storm – cyclically linked to many of the most intense solar storms of the past ~200 years. (2024 is the second most likely time, with the potential for disruptive solar storms in both years.)
Refer to latest Weekly Re-Lay & INSIIDE Track publications for additional details and/or related trading strategies.